22/10/2012
CONSPIRACY BEHIND JLPB BY INDIA AGAINST CORRUPTION TEAM
Conspiracy behind Anna Hazare’s “Fast unto death” agitation Anna Hazare’s “Fast unto death” agitation in Delhi from April 5, 2011 was the result of a big conspiracy hatched by the civil society activists, pro-western English media and the National Advisory Council. The2G, CWG and other scams and also the corruption charges raised by former Union Minister Subramanian Swami directly against Sonia Gandhi had all sullied the image of the UPA government very badly and the UPA had started losing by-elections in different states. Baba Ramdev’s anti-corruption campaign was also gaining momentum. Addressing a mammoth rally against corruption organized by Ramdev’s supporters in New Delhi on February 27, 2011, Ramdev had openly attacked the Congress for encouraging corruption in India. Ramdev had planned more such rallies and the Congress leadership was clearly unnerved. They knew that something had to be done urgently to divert the attention of the people and to neutralize Baba Ramdev’s campaign against corruption and black money. The civil society activists who came to the rescue of Sonia Gandhi then used Anna Hazare to launch a ‘fast unto death’ agitation demanding a stronger Lokpal Bill with inclusion of civil society members in the drafting committee and assuring Hazare national level mobilization of support for him by the vast and powerful network of civil society activists. The agitation that lasted for five days had an electrifying effect on the nation because of the unprecedented projection it got from the press and electronic media. The civil society activists organized protest demonstrations, dharnas, hunger strike and meetings in all major cities in India in support of Hazare’s agitation in Delhi. People in the cities were glued to different TV channels to know the latest development over Hazare’s fast. The hysteria created by the media over Hazare’s fast elevated him to the status of a national icon and he seemed to enjoy it. He probably started having hallucinations about becoming another Mahatma as indicated by his comment that had he continued his fast for another three or four days, the UPA government would have collapsed. Whatever it may be, the five-day‘fast unto death’ agitation planned and executed by the civil society activists was a bigger success than they hoped for as it helped to divert people’s attention from various scams to the controversial Lokpal Bill relegating the issue of corruption to the back seat. It also gave a big boost to Hazare’s personal image placating him and cementing his integration into the civil society club and cleared the way for the adoption of a stronger and more draconian Lokpal Bill. The five-day drama also showed how Anna Hazare has already become a prisoner of the so-called civil society. Anna Hazare during one of his interactive sessions with the newsmen at his agitational venue in Delhi had praised the development work done by chief ministers NarendraModi and Nitish Kumar in their respective states. The civil society activists like Medha Patkar and Harsh Mander had immediately taken objection to Hazare’s praise for Narendra Modi and drawing his attention to the role of Modi in the genocide of Muslims during the2002 communal riots in Gujarat. Anna Hazare subsequently was forced to issue a clarification stating that he had only praised Modi’s development work in Gujarat, and not his role in dealing with the riots.Media’s role A substantial section of the English media, both the press and electronic, under the influence of certain western agencies has always been supporting all anti-social elements and forces in the country for the past few years. Such biased sections of media had unashamedly supported Maoist movement, Kashmiri separatists, Islamic militants,etc, in the past. It is the same section of media which went out of the way to project Anna Hazare as a new messiah of the people and ensured the success of his ‘fast unto death’ agitation, which makes its intentions suspect. Where was this media, when Baba Ramdev addressed a massive gathering in Delhi on February 27th this year as part of his drive against corruption and black money? It got hardly any mention in the media. The media which helped to elevate Anna Hazare to the status of a national icon also helped the civil society crooks to hijack the anti-corruption drive of Baba Ramdev, using Anna Hazare. The civil society activists were also able to snatch a major role in drafting the Lokpal Bill and ensuring majority representation for them in the proposed all-powerful institution of Lokpal.
Jan Lokpal bill
The proposed Jan Lokpal bill, if accepted in the present form as drafted by the civil society activists, will be the most draconian piece of legislation. The bill demands that the members of the Lokpal be conferred with judicial and police powers. They also want the Supreme Court and Prime Minister also to be brought under the purview of the Lokpal. If this demand is accepted, the monster called Lokpal will have the power to dismiss even the Prime Minister and the chief justice of the Supreme Court.
A selection panel comprising of following dignitaries will appoint the members of the Lokpal.
1) Chairpersons of both Houses of Parliament
2) Two senior most judges of Supreme Court
3) Two senior most chief justices of High Court
4) All Nobel Laureates of Indian origin
5) Chairperson of National Human Rights Commission
6) Last two Magsaysay Award winners of Indian origin
7) Comptroller and Auditor General of India
8) Chief Election Commissioner
9) Bharat Ratna Award winners.
If these are the guidelines for constituting the selection panel, then most of the members in Lokpal will be the nominees of the civil society. What better prescription is there for the decimation of India as a nation state? The inclusion of Nobel Laureates of Indian origin and last two Magsaysay Award winners of Indian origin in the selection panel is interesting. Past experience shows that only nominees approved by the U.S. government can win the Nobel Prize. For instance, though many ardent fans of Mahatma Gandhi have won the Nobel Peace Prize, Gandhi himself was denied this honour despite being nominated five times and short-listed thrice. Gandhi, who showed the world that anything can be achieved through ‘satyagrah’ and non-violence was nominated for the award in 1937, 1938, 1939,1947 and afew days before he was martyred in January 1948. Similarly, India’s first prime minister, Jawaharlal Nehru, also failed to win the Nobel Prize, though he was nominated for this coveted award 11 times.Probably the socialist views of Nehru and Gandhi’s criticism against the conversion activities of Christian missionaries were not to the liking of the Nobel Committee and the U S. While Gandhi and Nehru were denied the Nobel Peace Prize, those who won the Nobel Peace award include the master manipulator and war monger Henry Kissinger in 1973, PLO leader and a terrorist Yasser Arafat in 1994and Mikhail Gorbachev in 1990 for presiding over the disintegration of the Soviet Union. The fact that some CIA-linked human rights organizations who support Maoist movement in India could mobilize the support of 44 Nobel Laureates to demand the immediate release of Dr.Binayak Sen, a jailed pro-Maoist human rights activist of Chattisgarh, further confirms the continued loyalty of Nobel Laureates to the various US agencies.As far as the Magsaysay Award winners are concerned, this award is an American award for Asians. These annual awards given to Asians under different categories, were constituted in 1957 by the Rockefeller Foundation in memory of Ramon Magsaysay, the former President of Philippines. The Magsaysay awards were earlier given to eligible people in five categories. In 2000, a new category, called emergent leadership, was introduced with the financial support from Ford Foundation and Aruna Roy of India was the first recipient of this category. The Magsaysay awards now appear to be reserved for only civil society activists or their nominees, as can be seen from the appended list of awardees since 2000.Year Winner2000 Aruna Roy, a civil society activist.2001 Rajendra Singh -do-2002 Sandeep Pandey -do-2003 J.M.Lyngdoh, a former chief election commissioner who after the Gujarat riots in 2002, postponed the state assembly elections in Gujarat despite opposition from Chief Minister Narendra Modi.2004 Admiral (Rtd) L.Ramdas, civil society activist2005 V,Shanta, a nominee of civil society.2006 Aravind Kejrival, civil society activist.2007 P.Sainath, a supporter of civil society.2008 Dr.Prakash Amte and Dr.Mandakini Amte, civil society activists.2009 Deepti Joshi
Truth about Anna Hazare’s “India Against Corruption” movement
The recent anti-corruption campaign and the “fast unto death”agitation planned and executed by the civil society activists using Anna Hazare as a tool was a big fraud committed by the so-called civil society activists on the innocent people of India to get an all-powerful’Lokpal’ Bill passed. The proposed Lokpal Bill seeks to undermine the authority of even the Supreme Court of India, which amounts to a change in the basic structure of our constitution. All core activists’ of the civil society enjoy the patronage of Sonia Gandhi. The National Advisory Council (NAC) is a representative body of the civil society activists. Ten of the 14 members in the NAC are civil society activists and other four are supporters of the civil society. Sonia Gandhi who controls the UPA government is also the chairperson of the NAC.Here in lies the great deception. There is no difference between the civil society activists and Sonia’s NAC members. Hence the proposed Lokpal institution is likely to be dominated by the minions of Sonia Gandhi. This will be disastrous. Since the civil society leaders want the breakup of India, all nationalist leaders and institutions will be the first target of the proposed Lokpal. The only way to save the situation is to stop the Lokpal Bill altogether. The ‘Lokpal’ could be a good and effective institution only if it is brought under the control of the Supreme Court, only impartial and eminent citizens or judges are inducted into it and all civil society activists are kept out of it.The public anger against corruption was ignited first by the explosion caused by the 2G spectrum scam involving a huge loss of more thanRs.170000 crore to the exchequer. More such scams as brought to light by the CWG scam and Adarsh Society scam, etc. involving huge losses to the exchequer and other irregularities further enraged the masses and their anger was mainly directed against UPA ministers and other party leaders who were involved in those scams. Under such circumstances when Anna Hazare started his “India Against Corruption” movement, it got overwhelming support from the people.The continued projection of Anna Hazare’s ‘fast unto death’ agitation demanding a stronger Lokpal Bill suddenly diverted the focus of public attention from the mega scams to the Lokpal Bill giving a much Needed respite to the UPA government. Thus the civil society activists with the help of a biased media not only bailed out the UPA government from the scam attack but paved the way for the creation of a civil society-dominated monstrous Lokpal Bill which if passed is certain to be misused by the civil society activists to achieve their sinister objectives. Anna Hazare has done immense harm to the country by aligning with the civil society activists. He has cheated the people and betrayed the country by becoming a party to the evil designs of the civil society.Just as Kiran Bedi was lured into the civil society club with the bait of Ramon Magsaysay award and a 94-minute documentary on Ms.Bedi,Anna Hazare also seems to have been lured into the civil society camp with the bait of a national icon status and a possible “Mahatma-hood”. If Anna Hazare continues to be associated with the so-called civil society activists, he will soon be proved to be a fake Mahatma. and a poor judge of people.
Civil Society Groups, an international menace
The civil society organizations are promoted, funded and controlled by certain western intelligence agencies, Corporate Houses and Foundations and Christian funding agencies to protect the interests of the US and its NATO allies and the church all over the world. The sinister activities of these groups are not confined to India alone. These groups are active in almost all countries in the world including Russia and China. However their assignments differ from one country to other depending upon the strategic interests of the western lobby in a particular country and the political affiliation of the ruling regime in that country. For instance, in authoritarian countries like China, Cuba and Venezuela, the objective of these groups is to cultivate a congenial atmosphere for the overthrow of the ruling regimes. In Russia, Prime Minister Putin is using some stringent laws introduced by him when he was the president, to curb the subversive activities ofthe civil society groups. In China, there are severe restrictions on civil society groups and a number of such groups were banned in the past.Liu Xiaobo, a Chinese national who won the Nobel Prize for peace in 2010, is a civil society activist of China. He is presently undergoing a11-year jail term in China for his alleged subversive activities. After the decimation of the LTTE, Sri Lanka is at last free from the three-decade old civil war and terrorism. But the civil society activists in Sri Lanka are accusing President Mahindra Rajapakse of genocide of thousands of innocent Tamils during the final phase of the war and calling for his trial by an international court for war crimes. In this regard, they have the backing of the United Nations, which has been reduced to a tool of USA and its allies for promoting their interests all over the world. In India, the civil society groups support the UPA government as it is a friendly political regime, controlled by some pro-US elements. Two main objectives of the so-called civil society in India are to promote Christianity and to encourage and support all militant and insurgency movements in India with the ultimate objective of a Soviet Union-type break-up of India into ten or fifteen independent smaller countries, which will serve the strategic interests of the USA. A big country like India with the second largest population in the world and fast-growing economy will be a big threat to America’s economic and military domination of the world. Hence the civil society is used by the U.S. and its allies to destabilize India by promoting all militant and secessionist activities, stalling all big development projects and encouraging continued inflow of illegal migrants into the country. Thus we have to realize that the so-called civil society is a bigger threat to the unity and integrity of India than corruption and hence both these threats need to be neutralized with all our might.
Conspiracy behind Anna Hazare’s “Fast unto death” agitation Anna Hazare’s “Fast unto death” agitation in Delhi from April 5, 2011 was the result of a big conspiracy hatched by the civil society activists, pro-western English media and the National Advisory Council. The2G, CWG and other scams and also the corruption charges raised by former Union Minister Subramanian Swami directly against Sonia Gandhi had all sullied the image of the UPA government very badly and the UPA had started losing by-elections in different states. Baba Ramdev’s anti-corruption campaign was also gaining momentum. Addressing a mammoth rally against corruption organized by Ramdev’s supporters in New Delhi on February 27, 2011, Ramdev had openly attacked the Congress for encouraging corruption in India. Ramdev had planned more such rallies and the Congress leadership was clearly unnerved. They knew that something had to be done urgently to divert the attention of the people and to neutralize Baba Ramdev’s campaign against corruption and black money. The civil society activists who came to the rescue of Sonia Gandhi then used Anna Hazare to launch a ‘fast unto death’ agitation demanding a stronger Lokpal Bill with inclusion of civil society members in the drafting committee and assuring Hazare national level mobilization of support for him by the vast and powerful network of civil society activists. The agitation that lasted for five days had an electrifying effect on the nation because of the unprecedented projection it got from the press and electronic media. The civil society activists organized protest demonstrations, dharnas, hunger strike and meetings in all major cities in India in support of Hazare’s agitation in Delhi. People in the cities were glued to different TV channels to know the latest development over Hazare’s fast. The hysteria created by the media over Hazare’s fast elevated him to the status of a national icon and he seemed to enjoy it. He probably started having hallucinations about becoming another Mahatma as indicated by his comment that had he continued his fast for another three or four days, the UPA government would have collapsed. Whatever it may be, the five-day‘fast unto death’ agitation planned and executed by the civil society activists was a bigger success than they hoped for as it helped to divert people’s attention from various scams to the controversial Lokpal Bill relegating the issue of corruption to the back seat. It also gave a big boost to Hazare’s personal image placating him and cementing his integration into the civil society club and cleared the way for the adoption of a stronger and more draconian Lokpal Bill. The five-day drama also showed how Anna Hazare has already become a prisoner of the so-called civil society. Anna Hazare during one of his interactive sessions with the newsmen at his agitational venue in Delhi had praised the development work done by chief ministers NarendraModi and Nitish Kumar in their respective states. The civil society activists like Medha Patkar and Harsh Mander had immediately taken objection to Hazare’s praise for Narendra Modi and drawing his attention to the role of Modi in the genocide of Muslims during the2002 communal riots in Gujarat. Anna Hazare subsequently was forced to issue a clarification stating that he had only praised Modi’s development work in Gujarat, and not his role in dealing with the riots.Media’s role A substantial section of the English media, both the press and electronic, under the influence of certain western agencies has always been supporting all anti-social elements and forces in the country for the past few years. Such biased sections of media had unashamedly supported Maoist movement, Kashmiri separatists, Islamic militants,etc, in the past. It is the same section of media which went out of the way to project Anna Hazare as a new messiah of the people and ensured the success of his ‘fast unto death’ agitation, which makes its intentions suspect. Where was this media, when Baba Ramdev addressed a massive gathering in Delhi on February 27th this year as part of his drive against corruption and black money? It got hardly any mention in the media. The media which helped to elevate Anna Hazare to the status of a national icon also helped the civil society crooks to hijack the anti-corruption drive of Baba Ramdev, using Anna Hazare. The civil society activists were also able to snatch a major role in drafting the Lokpal Bill and ensuring majority representation for them in the proposed all-powerful institution of Lokpal.
Jan Lokpal bill
The proposed Jan Lokpal bill, if accepted in the present form as drafted by the civil society activists, will be the most draconian piece of legislation. The bill demands that the members of the Lokpal be conferred with judicial and police powers. They also want the Supreme Court and Prime Minister also to be brought under the purview of the Lokpal. If this demand is accepted, the monster called Lokpal will have the power to dismiss even the Prime Minister and the chief justice of the Supreme Court.
A selection panel comprising of following dignitaries will appoint the members of the Lokpal.
1) Chairpersons of both Houses of Parliament
2) Two senior most judges of Supreme Court
3) Two senior most chief justices of High Court
4) All Nobel Laureates of Indian origin
5) Chairperson of National Human Rights Commission
6) Last two Magsaysay Award winners of Indian origin
7) Comptroller and Auditor General of India
8) Chief Election Commissioner
9) Bharat Ratna Award winners.
If these are the guidelines for constituting the selection panel, then most of the members in Lokpal will be the nominees of the civil society. What better prescription is there for the decimation of India as a nation state? The inclusion of Nobel Laureates of Indian origin and last two Magsaysay Award winners of Indian origin in the selection panel is interesting. Past experience shows that only nominees approved by the U.S. government can win the Nobel Prize. For instance, though many ardent fans of Mahatma Gandhi have won the Nobel Peace Prize, Gandhi himself was denied this honour despite being nominated five times and short-listed thrice. Gandhi, who showed the world that anything can be achieved through ‘satyagrah’ and non-violence was nominated for the award in 1937, 1938, 1939,1947 and afew days before he was martyred in January 1948. Similarly, India’s first prime minister, Jawaharlal Nehru, also failed to win the Nobel Prize, though he was nominated for this coveted award 11 times.Probably the socialist views of Nehru and Gandhi’s criticism against the conversion activities of Christian missionaries were not to the liking of the Nobel Committee and the U S. While Gandhi and Nehru were denied the Nobel Peace Prize, those who won the Nobel Peace award include the master manipulator and war monger Henry Kissinger in 1973, PLO leader and a terrorist Yasser Arafat in 1994and Mikhail Gorbachev in 1990 for presiding over the disintegration of the Soviet Union. The fact that some CIA-linked human rights organizations who support Maoist movement in India could mobilize the support of 44 Nobel Laureates to demand the immediate release of Dr.Binayak Sen, a jailed pro-Maoist human rights activist of Chattisgarh, further confirms the continued loyalty of Nobel Laureates to the various US agencies.As far as the Magsaysay Award winners are concerned, this award is an American award for Asians. These annual awards given to Asians under different categories, were constituted in 1957 by the Rockefeller Foundation in memory of Ramon Magsaysay, the former President of Philippines. The Magsaysay awards were earlier given to eligible people in five categories. In 2000, a new category, called emergent leadership, was introduced with the financial support from Ford Foundation and Aruna Roy of India was the first recipient of this category. The Magsaysay awards now appear to be reserved for only civil society activists or their nominees, as can be seen from the appended list of awardees since 2000.Year Winner2000 Aruna Roy, a civil society activist.2001 Rajendra Singh -do-2002 Sandeep Pandey -do-2003 J.M.Lyngdoh, a former chief election commissioner who after the Gujarat riots in 2002, postponed the state assembly elections in Gujarat despite opposition from Chief Minister Narendra Modi.2004 Admiral (Rtd) L.Ramdas, civil society activist2005 V,Shanta, a nominee of civil society.2006 Aravind Kejrival, civil society activist.2007 P.Sainath, a supporter of civil society.2008 Dr.Prakash Amte and Dr.Mandakini Amte, civil society activists.2009 Deepti Joshi
Truth about Anna Hazare’s “India Against Corruption” movement
The recent anti-corruption campaign and the “fast unto death”agitation planned and executed by the civil society activists using Anna Hazare as a tool was a big fraud committed by the so-called civil society activists on the innocent people of India to get an all-powerful’Lokpal’ Bill passed. The proposed Lokpal Bill seeks to undermine the authority of even the Supreme Court of India, which amounts to a change in the basic structure of our constitution. All core activists’ of the civil society enjoy the patronage of Sonia Gandhi. The National Advisory Council (NAC) is a representative body of the civil society activists. Ten of the 14 members in the NAC are civil society activists and other four are supporters of the civil society. Sonia Gandhi who controls the UPA government is also the chairperson of the NAC.Here in lies the great deception. There is no difference between the civil society activists and Sonia’s NAC members. Hence the proposed Lokpal institution is likely to be dominated by the minions of Sonia Gandhi. This will be disastrous. Since the civil society leaders want the breakup of India, all nationalist leaders and institutions will be the first target of the proposed Lokpal. The only way to save the situation is to stop the Lokpal Bill altogether. The ‘Lokpal’ could be a good and effective institution only if it is brought under the control of the Supreme Court, only impartial and eminent citizens or judges are inducted into it and all civil society activists are kept out of it.The public anger against corruption was ignited first by the explosion caused by the 2G spectrum scam involving a huge loss of more thanRs.170000 crore to the exchequer. More such scams as brought to light by the CWG scam and Adarsh Society scam, etc. involving huge losses to the exchequer and other irregularities further enraged the masses and their anger was mainly directed against UPA ministers and other party leaders who were involved in those scams. Under such circumstances when Anna Hazare started his “India Against Corruption” movement, it got overwhelming support from the people.The continued projection of Anna Hazare’s ‘fast unto death’ agitation demanding a stronger Lokpal Bill suddenly diverted the focus of public attention from the mega scams to the Lokpal Bill giving a much Needed respite to the UPA government. Thus the civil society activists with the help of a biased media not only bailed out the UPA government from the scam attack but paved the way for the creation of a civil society-dominated monstrous Lokpal Bill which if passed is certain to be misused by the civil society activists to achieve their sinister objectives. Anna Hazare has done immense harm to the country by aligning with the civil society activists. He has cheated the people and betrayed the country by becoming a party to the evil designs of the civil society.Just as Kiran Bedi was lured into the civil society club with the bait of Ramon Magsaysay award and a 94-minute documentary on Ms.Bedi,Anna Hazare also seems to have been lured into the civil society camp with the bait of a national icon status and a possible “Mahatma-hood”. If Anna Hazare continues to be associated with the so-called civil society activists, he will soon be proved to be a fake Mahatma. and a poor judge of people.
Civil Society Groups, an international menace
The civil society organizations are promoted, funded and controlled by certain western intelligence agencies, Corporate Houses and Foundations and Christian funding agencies to protect the interests of the US and its NATO allies and the church all over the world. The sinister activities of these groups are not confined to India alone. These groups are active in almost all countries in the world including Russia and China. However their assignments differ from one country to other depending upon the strategic interests of the western lobby in a particular country and the political affiliation of the ruling regime in that country. For instance, in authoritarian countries like China, Cuba and Venezuela, the objective of these groups is to cultivate a congenial atmosphere for the overthrow of the ruling regimes. In Russia, Prime Minister Putin is using some stringent laws introduced by him when he was the president, to curb the subversive activities ofthe civil society groups. In China, there are severe restrictions on civil society groups and a number of such groups were banned in the past.Liu Xiaobo, a Chinese national who won the Nobel Prize for peace in 2010, is a civil society activist of China. He is presently undergoing a11-year jail term in China for his alleged subversive activities. After the decimation of the LTTE, Sri Lanka is at last free from the three-decade old civil war and terrorism. But the civil society activists in Sri Lanka are accusing President Mahindra Rajapakse of genocide of thousands of innocent Tamils during the final phase of the war and calling for his trial by an international court for war crimes. In this regard, they have the backing of the United Nations, which has been reduced to a tool of USA and its allies for promoting their interests all over the world. In India, the civil society groups support the UPA government as it is a friendly political regime, controlled by some pro-US elements. Two main objectives of the so-called civil society in India are to promote Christianity and to encourage and support all militant and insurgency movements in India with the ultimate objective of a Soviet Union-type break-up of India into ten or fifteen independent smaller countries, which will serve the strategic interests of the USA. A big country like India with the second largest population in the world and fast-growing economy will be a big threat to America’s economic and military domination of the world. Hence the civil society is used by the U.S. and its allies to destabilize India by promoting all militant and secessionist activities, stalling all big development projects and encouraging continued inflow of illegal migrants into the country. Thus we have to realize that the so-called civil society is a bigger threat to the unity and integrity of India than corruption and hence both these threats need to be neutralized with all our might.
Posts
0 comments:
Post a Comment