Kumbh Mela : Swami Shri 108 Avatar Maharaj praise activities on Sanatan Sanstha

Swami Shri 108 Avatar Maharaj Ji releasing for public a flex board, ‘Gangasnan Dharmashastranusar kare’ (‘Take a bath in river Ganga as per scriptures’

Public release of flex board of Hindu Janajagruti Samiti about taking a bath in river Ganga !

Prayagaraj (UP) : All of us have reckoned western culture as most developed and competent. We started behaving according to western culture. Similarly, we started looking at Hindu culture as an inferior culture. As a result, lot of harm has been caused to us. Sanatan Sanstha is educating all of us on this issue. It is performing a great mission to sow the seeds of importance of Hindu culture. In these words, Swami Shri 108 Avatar Maharaj Ji, Head of Om Deen Dayal Ashram expressed His appreciation towards the mission of Sanatan Sanstha.

On this occasion, Swamiji was felicitated by waving a lit lamp around Him. A grand exhibition is organised jointly by Sanatan Sanstha and Hindu Janajagruti Samiti in Kumbh Mela for the establishment of Hindu Rashtra. A new flex board for this exhibition has been designed, which depicts ‘Gangasnan Dharmashastranusar kare’ (‘Take a bath in river Ganga as per scriptures’). This board has been released for public at the hands of Swamiji. Swamiji spoke on this occasion, “Sanatan Sanstha convinces the maturity of Hindu culture. Therefore, the interest of Hindu Dharma is being protected in a true sense. This mission is being performed by Sanstha selflessly. The company of such an organisation performing selfless service is unique. Various thoughts are propagated in Kumbh Mela. However, the thoughts spread by Sanatan Sanstha are the most important. If we become successful in transforming life of even one individual, we can claim that life has fructified. Even though, you and we are from different parts, we have attained harmony with each other, and we will never separate from each other. I pray unto Holy feet of God that may your mission spread far and wide.” 

Source : Dainik Sanatan Prabhat

Kumbh Mela : Active support assured to Sanatan’s mission ! – Shri Shri 1008 Mahant Shri Ramabalakdasaji Maharaj

Prayagaraj (UP) : Shri Shri 1008 Mahant Shri Ramabalakdasaji Maharaj of Ram-Lakshman Khalasa at Jaipur and Pandit Satishchandraji Parashar of Shri Kaliyamardan Krupa Nikunj Ashram, Vrundavan visited grand exhibition organised jointly by Sanatan Sanstha and Hindu Janajagruti Samiti in Kumbh Mela for the establishment of Hindu Nation. While watching the exhibition, Shri Ramabalakdasaji Maharaj said, “Your mission is very awesome. Hindus are not properly recognised in this nation. It is necessary to start imparting them education about Dharma at primary level. Society needs such a mission. We extend full cooperation to your mission.” Whereas, Pandit Satishchandraji Parashar said, “I will ensure that this topic reaches maximum number of people through my discourse on Bhagawat. Your mission is very admirable.”

Highlights

• Shri Ramabalakdasaji Maharaj refused to accept a copy of Hindi monthly, Sanatan Prabhat’ as a gift; instead he subscribed to the monthly on his own.

• Maharaj was very impressed by watching the exhibition of Holy texts and also purchased few of the Holy texts.

• Pandit Parashar assured to extend active support to the mission of Sanatan Sanstha.

Source : Dainik Sanatan Prabhat

Hindu Kush means Hindu Slaughter

By Shrinandan Vyas

All the Encyclopedias and National Geographic agree that Hindu Kush region is a place of Hindu genocide (similar to Dakau and Auschwitz). All the references are given. Please feel free to verify them.

---

ABSTRACTAll Standard reference books agree that the name 'Hindu Kush' of the mountain range in Eastern Afganistan means 'Hindu Slaughter' or 'Hindu Killer'. History also reveals that until 1000 A.D. the area of Hindu Kush was a full part of Hindu cradle. More likely, the mountain range was deliberately named as 'Hindu Slaughter' by the Moslem conquerors, as a lesson to the future generations of Indians. However Indians in general, and Hindus in particular are completely oblivious to this tragic genocide. This article also looks into the reasons behind this ignorance.
21 References - (Mainly Encyclopedia Britannica & other reference books, National Geographic Magazines and standard history books).

---

INTRODUCTIONThe Hindu Kush is a mountain system nearly 1000 miles long and 200 miles wide, running northeast to southwest, and dividing the Amu Darya River Valley and Indus River Valley. It stretches from the Pamir Plateau near Gilgit, to Iran. The Hindu Kush ranges mainly run thru Afganistan and Pakistan. It has over two dozen summits of more than 23,000 ft in height. Below the snowy peaks the mountains of Hindu Kush appear bare, stony and poor in vegetation. Historically, the passes across the Hindu Kush have been of great military significance, providing access to the northern plains of India. The Khyber Pass constitutes an important strategic gateway and offers a comparatively easy route to the plains of Punjab. Most foreign invaders, starting from Alexander the Great in 327 BC, to Timur Lane in 1398 AD, and from Mahmud of Ghazni, in 1001 AD, to Nader Shah in 1739 AD attacked Hindustan via the Khyber Pass and other passes in the Hindu Kush (1,2,3). The Greek chroniclers of Alexander the Great called Hindu Kush as Parapamisos or Paropanisos (4). The Hindu name of the Hindu Kush mountains was 'Paariyaatra Parvat'(5).

---

EARLY HISTORY OF HINDU KUSH REGION (UP TO 1000 AD)History of Hindu Kush and Punjab shows that two major kingdoms of Gandhaar & Vaahic Pradesh (Balkh of Bactria) had their borders extending far beyond the Hindu Kush. Legend has it that the kingdom of Gandhaar was established by Taksha, grandson of Bharat of Ayodhya (6). Gandhaar's borders extended from Takshashila to Tashkent (corruption of 'Taksha Khand') in the present day Uzbekistan. In the later period, Mahabharat relates Gaandhaari as a princess of Gandhaar and her brother, Shakuni as a prince and later as Gandhaar's ruler.
In the well documented history, Emperor Chandragupt Maurya took charge of Vaahic Pradesh around 325 BC and then took over Magadh. Emperor Ashok's stone tablets with inscriptions in Greek and Aramaic are still found at Qandahar (corruption of Gandhaar?) and Laghman in eastern Afganistan(3). One such stone tablet, is shown in the PBS TV series 'Legacy with Mark Woods' in episode 3 titled 'India: The Spiritual Empire'. After the fall of Mauryan empire, Gandhaar was ruled by Greeks. However some of these Greek rulers had converted to Buddhism, such as Menander, known to Indian historians as Milinda, while some other Greeks became followers of Vishnav sects (Hinduism)(7). Recent excavations in Bactria have revealed a golden hoard which has among other things a figurine of a Greek goddess with a Hindu mark on its forehead (Bindi) showing the confluence of Hindu-Greek art (8). Later Shaka and KushaaN ruled Gandhaar and Vaahic Pradesh. KushaaN emperor Kanishka's empire stretched from Mathura to the Aral Sea (beyond the present day Uzbekistan, Tajikistan, and Krygzystan)(9).
Kanishaka was a Buddhist and under KushaaN influence Buddhism flourished in Gandhaar. Two giant sandstone Buddhas carved into the cliffs of Bamian (west of Kabul) date from the Kushan period. The larger Buddha (although defaced in later centuries by Moslem invaders) is about 175 ft tall (10,11). The Kushan empire declined by 450 AD. The Chinese traveller Hsuan-Tsang (Xuan-zang) travelled thru the region in 7 th century AD and visited many Buddhist religious centers (3) including Hadda, Ghazni, Qonduz, Bamian (3,10,11), Shotorak and Bagram. From the 5 th thru 9 th cenury AD Persian Sasanians and Hepthalites ruled Gandhaar. During their rule Gandhaar region was again influenced by Hinduism. The Hindu kings (Shahiya) were concentrated in the Kabul and Ghazni areas. The last Hindu Shahiya king of Kabul, Bhimapal was killed in 1026 AD. The heroic efforts of the Hindu Shahiya Kings to defend the northwestern gates of India against the invaders are described by even al-Biruni, the court historian of Mahmud of Ghazni (12). Some excavated sites of the period include a major Hindu Shahiya temple north of Kabul and a chapel that contains both Buddhist and Hindu images, indicating that there was a mingling of two religions (3).
Islamic invasions on Afganistan started in 642 AD, but over the next several centuries their effect was marginal and lasted only a short time after each raid. Cities surrendered only to rise in revolt and the hastily converted returned to their old religion (Hinduism or Buddhism) once the Moslem armies had passed (3).
THUS TILL THE YEAR 1000 AD AFGANISTAN WAS A FULL PART OF HINDU CRADLE.

---

HINDU KUSH AND THE HINDU GENOCIDENow Afganistan is a Moslem country. Logically, this means either one or more of the following must have happened:
a) original residents of Hindu Kush converted to Islam, or
b) they were slaughtered and the conquerors took over, or
c) they were driven out.
Encyclopedia Britannica (3) already informs us above about the resistance to conversion and frequent revolt against to the Moslem conqueror's rule from 8 th thru 11 th Century AD. The name 'Hindu Kush' itself tells us about the fate of the original residents of Gandhaar and Vaahic Pradesh during the later period of Moslem conquests, because HINDU KUSH in Persian MEANS HINDU SLAUGHTER (13) (as per Koenraad Elst in his book 'Ayodhya and After'). Let us look into what other standard references say about Hindu Kush.
Persian-English dictionary (14) indicates that the word 'Kush' is derived from the verb Kushtar - to slaughter or carnage. Kush is probably also related to the verb Koshtan meaning to kill. In Urdu, the word Khud-kushi means act of killing oneself (khud - self, Kushi- act of killing). Encyclopedia Americana comments on the Hindu Kush as follows: The name Hindu Kush means literally 'Kills the Hindu', a reminder of the days when (Hindu) SLAVES from Indian subcontinent died in harsh Afgan mountains while being transported to Moslem courts of Central Asia (15). The National Geographic Article 'West of Khyber Pass' informs that 'Generations of raiders brought captive Hindus past these peaks of perpetual snow. Such bitter journeys gave the range its name Hindu Kush - "Killer of Hindus"'(10). The World Book Encyclopedia informs that the name Kush, .. means Death ..(16). While Encyclopedia Britannica says 'The name Hindu Kush first appears in 1333 AD in the writings of Ibn Battutah, the medieval Berber traveller, who said the name meant 'Hindu Killer', a meaning still given by Afgan mountain dwellers who are traditional enemies of Indian plainsmen (i.e. Hindus)(2). However, later the Encyclopedia Britannica gives a negationist twist by adding that 'more likely the name is a corruption of Hindu-Koh meaning Hindu mountains'. This is unlikely, since the term Koh is used in its proper, uncorrupted form for the western portion of Hindu Kush, viz. Koh-i-Baba, for the region Swat Kohistan, and in the names of the three peaks of this range, viz. Koh-i-Langer, Koh-i-Bandakor, and Koh-i-Mondi. Thus to say that corruption of term Koh to Kush occurred only in case of Hindu Kush is merely an effort to fit in a deviant observation to a theory already proposed. In science, a theory is rejected if it does not agree with the observations, and not the other way around. Hence the latter negationist statement in the Encyclopedia Britannica must be rejected.
IT IS SIGNIFICANT THAT ONE OF THE FEW PLACE NAMES ON EARTH THAT REMINDS US NOT OF THE VICTORY OF THE WINNERS BUT RATHER THE SLAUGHTER OF THE LOSERS, CONCERNS A GENOCIDE OF HINDUS BY THE MOSLEMS (13).
Unlike the Jewish holocaust, the exact toll of the Hindu genocide suggested by the name Hindu Kush is not available. However the number is easily likely to be in millions. Few known historical figures can be used to justify this estimate. Encyclopedia Britannica informs that in December 1398 AD, Timur Lane ordered the execution of at least 50,000 captives before the battle for Delhi, .. and after the battle those inhabitants (of Delhi) not killed were removed (as slaves) (17), while other reference says that the number of captives butchered by Timur Lane's army was about 100,000 (18). Later on Encyclopedia Britannica mentions that the (secular?) Mughal emperor Akbar 'ordered the massacre of about 30,000 (captured) Rajput Hindus on February 24, 1568 AD, after the battle for Chitod' (19). Another reference indicates that this massacre of 30,000 Hindu peasants at Chitod is recorded by Abul Fazl, Akbar's court historian himself (20). These two 'one day' massacres are sufficient to provide a reference point for estimating the scale of Hindu genocide. The Afgan historian Khondamir records that during one of the many repeated invasions on the city of Herat in western Afganistan, 1,500,000 residents perished (11).
Since some of the Moslem conquerors took Indian plainsmen as slaves, a question comes : whatever happened to this slave population? The startling answer comes from New York Times (May-June 1993 issues). The Gypsies are wandering peoples in Europe. They have been persecuted in almost every country. Nazis killed 300,000 gypsies in the gas chambers. These Gypsies have been wandering around Central Asia and Europe since around the 12 th Century AD. Until now their country of origin could not be identified. Also their Language has had very little in common with the other European languages. Recent studies however show that their language is similar to Punjabi and to a lesser degree to Sanskrit. Thus the Gypsies most likely originated from the greater Punjab. The time frame of Gypsy wanderings also coincides early Islamic conquests hence most likely their ancestors were driven out of their homes in Punjab and taken as slaves over the Hindu Kush.
The theory of Gypsie origins in India was first proposed over two centuries ago. It is only recently theta linguistic and other proofs have been verified. Even the Gypsie leadership now accepts India as the country of their origin.
Thus it is evident that the mountain range was named as Hindu Kush as a reminder to the future Hindu generations of the slaughter and slavery of Hindus during the Moslem conquests.

---

DELIBERATE IGNORANCE ABOUT HINDU KUSHIf the name Hindu Kush relates such a horrible genocide of Hindus, why are Hindus ignorant about it? and why the Government of India does not teach them about Hindu Kush? The history and geography curriculums in Indian Schools barely even mention Hindu Kush. The horrors of the Jewish holocaust are taught not only in schools in Israel and USA, but also in Germany. Because both Germany and Israel consider the Jewish holocaust a 'dark chapter' in the history. The Indian Government instead of giving details of this 'dark chapter' in Indian history is busy in whitewash of Moslem atrocities and the Hindu holocaust. In 1982, the National Council of Educational Research and Training issued a directive for the rewriting of school texts. Among other things it stipulated that: 'Characterization of the medieval period as a time of conflict between Hindus and Moslems is forbidden'. Thus denial of history or Negationism has become India's official 'educational' policy (21).
Often the official governmental historians brush aside questions such as those that Hindu Kush raises. They argue that the British version is the product of their 'divide and rule' policy' hence their version is not necessarily true. However it must be remembered that the earliest reference of the name Hindu Kush and its literal meaning 'Hindu Killer' comes from Ibn Battutah in 1333 AD, and at that time British were nowhere on the Indian scene. Secondly, if the name indeed was a misnomer then the Afgans should have protested against such a barbaric name and the last 660 plus years should have been adequate for a change of name to a more 'civil'name. There has been no effort for such a change of name by the Afgans. On the contrary, when the Islamic fundamentalist regime of the Mujahadeens came to power in 1992, tens of thousands of Hindus and Sikhs from Kabul, became refugees, and had to pay steep ransom to enter into Pakistan without a visa.
In the last 46 years the Indian Government also has not even once demanded that the Afgan Government change such an insulting and barbaric name. But in July 1993, the Government of India asked the visiting Jerusalem Symphony Orchestra to change its name because the word Jerusalem in its name is offensive to Moslem Fundamentalists.

---

CONCLUSIONIt is evident that Hindus from ancient India's (Hindustan's) border states such as Gandhaar and Vaahic Pradesh were massacred or taken as slaves by the Moslem invaders who named the region as Hindu Kush (or Hindu Slaughter,or Hindu Killer) to teach a lesson to the future Hindu generations of India. Unfortunately Hindus are not aware of this tragic history. The Indian government does not want the true history of Hindu Moslem conflicts during the medieval ages to be taught in schools. This policy of negationism is the cause behind the ignorance of Hindus about the Hindu Kush and the Hindu genocide.

---

COMMENTS & FUTURE WORKAlthough in this article Hindu Kush has been referred to as Hindu slaughter, it is quite possible that it was really a Hindu and Buddhist slaughter. Since prior to Moslem invasions influence of Buddhism in Gandhaar and Vaahic Pradesh was considerable. Also as the huge 175 ft stone Buddhas of Bamian show, Buddhists were idol worshipers par excellence. Hence for Moslem invaders the Buddhists idol worshipers were equally deserving of punishment. It is also likely that Buddhism was considered an integral part of the Hindu pantheon and hence was not identified separately.

This article barely scratches the surface of the Hindu genocide, the true depth of which is as yet unknown. Readers are encouraged to find out the truth for themselves . Only when many readers search for the truth, the real magnitude of the Hindu genocide will be discovered.

---

REFERENCES

1. Encyclopedia Britannica, 15 th Ed, Vol.5, p.935, 1987


2. Encyclopedia Britannica, 15 th Ed, Vol.14, pp.238-240, 1987


3. Encyclopedia Britannica, 15 th Ed, Vol.13, pp.35-36, 1987


4. The Invasion of India by Alexander the Great (as described by Arrian, Q.Curtius, Diodoros, Plutarch & Justin), By J.W.McCrindle, Methuen & Co., London, p.38, 1969


5. Six Glorious Epochs of Indian History, by Veer Savarkar, Savarkar Prakashan, Bombay, 2nd Ed, p.206, 1985


6. Chanakya - a TV series by Doordarshan, India


7. Encyclopedia Britannica, 15 th Ed, Vol.21, pp.36-41, 1987


8. V.Sarianidi, National Geographic Magazine, Vol.177, No.3, p.57, March 1990


9. Hammond Historical Atlas of the World, pp. H4 & H10, 1993


10. W.O.Douglas, National Geographic Magazine, vol.114, No.1, pp.13-23, July 1958


11. T.J.Abercrombie, National Geographic Magazine, Vol.134, No.3, pp.318-325, Sept.1968


12. An Advanced History of India, by R.C.Majumdar, H.C.Raychaudhuri, K.Datta, 2nd Ed., MacMillan and Co, London, pp.182-83, 1965


13. Ayodhya and After, By Koenraad Elst, Voice of India Publication, p.278, 1991


14. A Practical Dictionary of the Persian Language, by J.A.Boyle, Luzac & Co., p.129, 1949


15. Encyclopedia Americana, Vol.14, p.206, 1993


16. The World Book Encyclopedia, Vol.19, p.237, 1990


17. Encyclopedia Britannica, 15 th Ed, Vol.21, pp. 54-55, 1987


18. An Advanced History of India, by R.C.Majumdar, H.C.Raychaudhuri, K.Datta, 2nd Ed., MacMillan and Co, London, pp.336-37, 1965


19. Encyclopedia Britannica, 15 th Ed, Vol.21, p.65, 1987


20. The Cambridge History of India, Vol.IV - The Mughul Period, by W.Haig & R.Burn, S.Chand & Co., New Delhi, pp. 98-99, 1963


21. Negationism in India, by Koenraad Elst, Voice of India Publ, 2nd Ed, pp.57-58, 1993

sources:hindunet

Dear Muslim Celebrities: Why do you play the Communal Card?

India is at least 81% Hindu. No matter how you slice and dice, this is an overwhelmingly Hindu majority nation. There's no denying of that fact.But it is also an important fact that India has been very successful in unifying its extremely diverse population. There are 1000s of castes among all religions. There are at least 7 religions. There are 18 major and 100s of minor languages (not mere dialects). There are incredible number of food preparation types, dress differences, mode of worship variations. It's not an exaggeration if I say, every 100 kilometer you travel, you see a very different India or Bharat. More importantly, in spite of centuries old fault lines across many groups in India, that have even caused riots and violence, all communities in India have grown up well over the past 65 years. No religion or caste group has been left out, if you look at the census demographics.

In such an extremely diverse India, there are celebrities. There are celebrities from every language, skin colour, height, weight, gender, caste background, class connection, religious affiliation and so on. The fact of the matter is that, most fans of celebrities hardly care about the celebrity's religious or other affiliations.

In such diverse and unifying India, time and again, we see some very silly, unwarranted and dangerous communal cards being played by some celebrities. This column focuses on a few such cards being played by celebrities who happen to have Muslim names or parents. Sanjay Dutt, Emraan Hashmi, Shah Rukh Khan, Mohammed Azharuddin and Shabana Azmi have been picked to “talk” to, in this column.

So let's talk to them : Hello celebrities. Let's get it straight. Each one of you have been very successful in your art, politics or sports field. Majority of your fans didn't care about your father's name, mother's name, place of birth, religious affiliation, spouse's religion, children's beliefs, your visits to places of worship (or the lack of it), your income class, your foreign trips, your meetings with other nationalities or other religious groups, your paper/TV/book subscription, your charity donation to religious or non-religious groups, your competence in any religious area, your dress at your home or during festivals... the list goes on...

Then why the heck do you play communal card at the drop of a hat, defaming the supremely accommodating, truly secular Indian society? Yes, there may be irritating apples in India, but they are far outnumbered by people who give a damn about your background or belief, and respect you for what you are capable of in the field of art, sports and others.

1) Let's start with Sanjay Dutt : In 2009, you said this: “I was there (in jail) for 3.5 years and was tortured because my mother was a Muslim, and I was a Muslim's son.” in public. [link]

Sir, Are you not ashamed to say such a thing, after decades of love, affection and support given by the Indian society?

You are married three times and your first two wives were Hindus --  Richa Sharma and Rhea Pillai.

In spite of being caught with an illegal AK 56 gun at your home, that too during a very sensitive early 1990s of Mumbai, your loyal fans adored you as Munna Bhai during later years. They never deserted you. In fact, your loyal fans (yes, most are Hindus), prayed for you, putting your picture next to their beloved God Ganesha.


Source: Sanjay-Dutt
You have been exposed by media of having links with dangerous gangsters, but people have pardoned you. [Link]

You have admitted even in the Supreme Court that you had dinner with India's most wanted terrorist and gangster. But still people watch your movies. [Link]

Your father has been elected to Indian parliament 5 times and your sister is also a politician just like you.

So, sir, why play sick communal card bringing disrepute to your entire fan following, the system you has made you a celebrity and your own country? Fight a case by its merit in the court if needed, but not by playing victim in the public. Should we say shame on you?

2) Let's now talk to Emran Hashmi: In 2009 you claimed: “I had finalised a deal to buy a flat, but the society refused to issue a No Objection Certificate because I am a Muslim”. [Link]

Dude, you had problem buying one property, and suddenly you realize you are a Muslim and that must be the reason?

Let's get some things straight. No one cared if your mother was a Christian, your dad was Muslim and your cousins are Hindu.

No one cared you were a Muslim when you went on kissing countless girls on the screen. Did anyone count how many Hindu girls you kissed on screen till date?



Also, have you seen 'exclusive to Christians' apartment ad, that too government approved buildings, from Mohali? Wake up.. This is India and there are numerous cases where people prefer their own community inside their residential societies.



Yes, people give apartments based on many of their own biases. Some are legal and some are not. If you dig deeper, there will be plenty of areas where Muslims discriminate against Hindus too. Visit Malapuram district in Kerala once and speak to some Hindu land owners whose land is surrounded by Muslim land owners. Stop being a cry baby due to one episode. The same Mumbai will have lakhs of apartments for sale where the owner does not care 3 hoots about who is buying, as long as you pay the money they want. You and your uncle Mahesh Bhatt going to press and painting yourself as “communal victims” will not help. You have enough fame, name and money to fight cases in court if you see some injustice.

3) Now the so-called “King” Shah Rukh Khan: Let's only focus on his latest 2013 interview: “I imagine this (giving "Indian" first names to kids) will prevent my offspring from receiving unwarranted eviction orders or random fatwas in the future.” [Link]


Source: fanpop
You must be kidding.. right Shah Rukh? Eviction order for your kids? LoL!

Your grandfather maybe from Afghanistan, your father maybe from today's Pakistan, and you may be married to a Hindu wife. But no one cared in the past 20 years when you kept rising to stardom.

No one cared if you went to study at Jamia Milia Islamia, while the name itself says something about religion there.

Majority of the Indians do not see your movies because you are a “Muslim” hero..They like your acting skills and they adore you.

Even when you publicly created drunken nuisance at Wankhede stadium, still people went and watched your movies. Did anyone ask you what was the religion of that poor security person whom you abused in a drunken state that night, like a third grade street thug?


Source: IBNLive
Majority of India supported you when you had to face immigration issues in America. Even the government of India stepped into the controversy, which is not a norm at all. In fact more support came to you even though another proud Indian Muslim, Abdul Kalam was frisked twice at a US airport against norms. (And to his credit, Abdul Kalam did not play any victim card like you).

So dear SRK – After a huge fan following for decades, living a dream life in India, owning a sports team and enjoying lavish media focus, you should be the last one to even think of playing a communal card. So disappointing...

4) Now let's say hello to a Congress MP, Azharuddin: In 2000, after being banned for life for match fixing scandal, you said something like this: “I am being targeted because I belong to the minority community”. [Link]


Source: MyWebdunia
You must be really out of your mind, aren't you Azhar bhai?

For heavens sake, you were made to lead a cricket team from a country of 82% Hindus, and also a country where cricket is a religion by itself! People looked at your sporting talent, and not your first name Mohammed.

When you were banned for life (till 2012 court ruling) from Indian cricket, it was not just you. The decisions were taken based on the dirty games played by many players. Yes, Hindu named players also got the boot.

You could date and marry (that too make her the 2^nd wife) a Hindu girl, and no one had any objection in India.

You were elected to the highest body of decision making of India, the parliament, using the ticket from the ruling Congress party. Wasn't that a privilege that the democratic India offered you? Yes, everyone knew that you had the name Mohammed on your election ticket.

You were not even forced to keep the Indian traditional welcome teeka on the forehead, which is common while arriving/departing the country, or while celebrating. Even the English and West Indian players won't refuse. But your religious “sentiments” were cared for and as far as we remember, you didn't sport a teeka proudly as a captain, like Dhoni does.


Source: thewe.cc
Looking back at the silly and sick communal card you played, after being caught cheating, are you not ashamed dear Azhar?

5) Lastly, let's say hello to Shabana Azmi: You claimed in 2008: “If Javed Akhtar (husband) and Shabana Azmi (wife) cannot get a flat in Bombay because they are Muslims, then what are we talking about?' [Link]


Source: Chandrakantha
Ouch.. that's too simplistic and silly to even consider saying Ms.Azmi.

None of your fans stopped watching your movies all these years because you were a Muslim actress. They cared for your beauty, talent and expression, and that's pretty much it.

No one cared if both of your parents were members of communist party, while majority of Indians don't care a hoot for communism. In fact majority of the Indians despise communist ideology, but still that never affected your rise in Bollywood, in the same city you referred, Mumbai/Bombay!

No one cared if you are the second wife of a man who claims to be an atheist. For your information, India is overwhelmingly God believing and God following. Atheists are fringe minority in this nation.

Not many cared if you portrayed for the first time in Indian films a lesbian act on screen, while lesbianism is such a big no-no for the mainstream in India.

I ask, why should we even care for any of these? Still at the very first opportunity to showcase your “Muslim” identity, you stooped down to a shameful level and went public with your grievance? Just like Emraan, don't you think you are super famous, rich and well connected to fight any real grievance in the court? Playing “Muslim” card in public after all the decades of success in a not-so-Muslim India was OK with you?

Also, did you or your famous husband speak up even once to support Subramanian Swamy's Madras HC 2007 petition about Melvisharam panchayat? It would help if you can read and educate about some discrimination in India by Muslims too: [link]

Conclusion: Grow up guys... Grow up: India is not perfect. There might be that odd feeling of discrimination you will see. But there are 1000s of places where no one cares about your background. All they care is your talent, money and other relevant things. Do not be itching to turn everything into a Hindu-Muslim issue for some cheap publicity. There are laws to help you if you can't get an apartment, if you can't get a bail, if you don't feel safe at a particular place, if you can't release a movie and so on. Why not use them just like crores of other Indians?

Of all the people, why do you, the celebrities, who have become so successful, rich, and popular in a secular and democratic India, play that shady communal card? We can at least understand if a poor butcher or mechanic on the street plays victim for whatever reason.

Why do you betray your tremendous fan following with such silly communal cards? The next time your fans will keep the silly card that you played about your “identity”, which they hardly cared all these year.

Why feed Pakistanis, terrorists and others who eagerly wait for an opportunity to malign India's pluralistic growth success? For instance Shah Rukh Khan's “safety” in India is a big concern for Pakistan, where minorities were reduced from a quarter of its population 65 years back to almost extinction now.

Why do a big disservice to the nation and the society that has skyrocketed you to such celebrity status?

Think.. Introspect and please grow up...

Source:IBTL          

Mahesh Bhatt's call to Indian Muslims for Jihad against Hindus

Mahesh Bhatt a intellect jihadi is promoting jihad in Bharat. It is interesting to note that in his speech he referred to  unjust s that has been perpetrated against muslims  and goes on justifying jihad. I agree when he says this fight will not end here it will go on, this fight was started by muslims and will end at the fall of muslims.

It sure seems like Mahesh Bhatt has a private war going only with the Hindu pantheon. For a man who is so likeably pleasant and approachable, he can be pretty stubborn too. Those who know this strong-willed, immensely creative filmmaker are aware of the distance he keeps from temples and rituals. When his own daughter Pooja Bhatt got married in a temple in Goa, he refused to step in and be a part of the ceremony.

The son of a Muslim mother who was kept away from the main Bhatt family, Mahesh waged a war with “God” in his childhood when he would go into his Hindu father’s house, an utterly humiliating experience for the sensitive, forever-questioning child. He had vowed then that only success would give him respect and a place in society; success would be his only God.

In all Bhatt productions thus far, the Hindu pantheon is never a big deal. It can be grotesque like it is in Murder 2 but not benign and godly. Mahesh’s fight is not with other religions. In Jannat he was quite comfortable showing namaaz being offered and an Islamic lifestyle. In his latest, Murder 2, set in Goa, it is Jesus Christ, Mother Mary, a saintly sister and a calm, tranquil church. And it works well. In Murder 2, hero Emraan Hashmi has a war going with his God ever since he is orphaned. Hindi films have time and again encashed stories of an atheistical hero’s battle with God where the gods invariably win at the end, in classic Deewaar style. In Murder 2, the weather-beaten hero finally does away with the devilish villain and steps into church, a changed, chastened man. It’s a formula that works brilliantly and it does in Murder 2 as well.
Source:Telegraph (extract is represented here)

Let's unite to rebuild buldozed 40-year-old statue of Netaji Bose at New Delhi

Paush Krushnapaksha 13, Kaliyug Varsha 5114

Note : Anyone can send their lawful protest to concerned authorities directly through Comments Section on HJS Website.

'Left : Statue of Netaji Bose' and 'Right : Statue of Netaji demolished'

A more than 40-year-old statue of Netaji Subhas Chandra Bose at Netaji Subhash Park in Delhi has been removed to make way for the construction of a Metro Rail Station. The move has come in for criticism by many, most notably, the Bhagat Singh Kranti Sena and Akhil Bharat Hindu Yuvak Sabha.

BSKS president Tajinder Pal Singh Bagga told Niti Central, “Freedom fighters who are not related to the Gandhi family have always been ignored in our country. We will not endure any action which disrespects the honour of Netaji Subhas Bose.”

According to the petition filed by the BSKS, the location of the metro station has been shifted 50 metres from its original site to make sure that some relics belonging to the Muslim community are not destroyed. But the change of location has resulted in a situation where the old statue of Netaji needs to be demolished.

Bhagat Singh Kranti Sena, a Delhi-based social organisation, has filed a petition before Delhi Chief Minister Shiela Dikshit against the demolition. The petition sent to the Delhi Chief Minister also demands the construction of a similar statue of Netaji in case the metro station construction does take place as planned.

The BSKS has also threatened the Delhi Government saying that if they are not heard, they will be forced to agitate and take legal recourse in order to fight for Netaji’s honour.

Full text of the BSKS petition to Sheila Dikshit

This letter is with reference to the issue of alleged removal/demolition of a More than 40 year old & one of the biggest statue of Netaji Subhas Bose at Netaji Subhash Park, for the purpose of construction of Metro Rail Station. As per our information, DMRC had taken the decision to move the proposed site for the construction of the Metro station by 50 metres for the purpose of making sure that the disputed structure that had come up over there after the discovery of some relics, is not destroyed. While we respect the decision of the Honorable Supreme Court to Maintain Status Quo of disputed structure that has been put up over there by the Muslim Community of the locality, the sad part is that even while keeping the sentiments of the Muslims of the place and honouring the decision of the Supreme Court, DMRC did not even think twice before removing the statue of one of India’s foremost Freedom Fighters, i.e Netaji Subhas Bose. We would like to ask if DMRC and the Delhi Government at all respect and value the sentiments of hundreds of millions of patriotic Indians who have the highest respect for the sacrifices and the valour of Netaji Subhas Bose.

Is the importance of Netaji’s statue less than that of a disputed structure that has been forcefully put up ?

While we appreciate the construction of the metro rail and we also respect the stay order of the Supreme Court on the demolition of the disputed structure, it is sad that the sentiments of patriotic Indians have been ignored by DMRC and Delhi Government. Netaji Subhash Bose was no ordinary person whose installed statue can be removed/demolished by authorities at will.

Therefore we request you to give firm commitment in writing that DMRC would install a similar statue of Netaji in the park after the construction of the metro station is completed and would also endeavour to name the station after him since the metro station itself is coming up in the park named after him. We also demand that as a mark of respect and honour for one of India’s greatest freedom fighters, DMRC would at least put up a photo gallery of Netaji and Azad Hind Fauj’s photographs inside the station. We would request you to kindly take this letter in the right spirit of its content and intent, and not to presume that people would forget about the issue in a matter of time. We are law abiding citizens of this country with the highest regards for those who have given their lives and blood for this nation and we hope that our sentiments would be honoured. If not, we would be compelled to take the route of agitations and litigations for restoring the honour of Netaji.

Source : Niti Central

Protest letter by Akhil Bharat Hindu Yuvak Sabha

To,
Mrs.Sheela Dikshit
Chief Minister of Delhi.
New Delhi
Subject : Demolition of the statue of Netaji Subhash Chander Bose at Netaji Subhas Park, Delhi.
Dear CM,
We are writing to you with sorrow and pain as news about demolition of that statue of Netaji Subhash Chander Bose at Netaji Subhas Park reached us. This more than 40 year old statue has been removed by DMRC to facilitate the building of Metro station.
It is unfortunate that DMRC and Govt.of Delhi decided to demolish the statue of the tallest figure in the freedom struggle of India. The said statue is pride of all nationalistic people of Delhi in particular and of India in general. Metro is an integral part of development for Delhi and nation as a whole but it is incorrect to demolish the statue of the personality those who sacrificed his life for our freedom, this is a clear indication of sadistic attitude of your government towards our freedom fighters.
Freedom fighter are being defamed and it seems to be the policy of the establishment, both GOI and Govt.of Delhi are deliberately making attempt of discrediting the Freedom fighters because of whom we are breathing freely in this country.
We at Akhil Bharat Hindu Yuvak Sabha urge you to commit to reinstallation of statue of Netaji Subhash Chander Bose and re-establish the glory of Netaji Subhash Park once Metro finishes its constrictions. We look forward to a response from you , this matter is related to our nationalistic sentiments and we will take this matter to common masses in absence of your prompt action.

Thanking you and Jai Shri Ram,
Rakesh Gurkha
National Spokesperson
Akhil Bharat Hindu Yuvak Sabha

Pune : Hindus come forward to make ‘Hindu Dharmasabha ’ a success !

Pune (Maharashtra) : Hindu Janajagruti Samiti (HJS) has 

organized a grand ‘Hindu Dharmajagruti Sabha (sabha)’ on 17^th March on the ground of Goyalganga Building, Sinhgad Rasta (Manikbaug). A meeting of pro-Hindu activists was held in that connection on 4^th February in the evening at Vitthal Mandir in Vitthalwadi. Many pro-Hindu organizations made a resolve to unite and make the ‘sabha’, a success. They showed their readiness in participating in this ‘Dharma yadnya’ through different mediums.

Shri. Shivaji (Appa) Yewale, the vice-President of BJP for Khadakvasla Constituency, Shri. Santosh Gopal of Yuva Sena, Shri. Nikhil Paygude, a member of Grampanchayat from Donaje, Shri. Pravin Paygude of Shiv Sena, Shri. Amol Nachan, the coordinator of Bajarang Dal, Shri. Pravin Zende of Hindu Rashtra Sena, Shri. Lakshmikant Sharma of ‘Patit-Pavan’ Sanghatana’, Shri. Raj Purohit of ‘Seva Sangh’, Shri. Prasad Paygude of Amruteshwar Trust and Shri. Sunil Ghanavat of HJS, about 35 persons, attended the meeting. Shri. Shivajirao Yewale, Shri. Nachan and Shri. Zende offered to provide financial support and make arrangements for publicity. It has been decided to hold a meeting on every Monday.

Source : Dainik Sanatan Prabhat

Will unite Hindus all over the nation to build Ram temple : VHP

Unanimous resolution of Dharmacharyas, Saints and Sages in Dharma Sansad of VHP !

Prayagaraj (Uttar Pradesh) : The agitation organised for building Shriram temple is the only massive agitation of its scale after the independence movement. However, unfortunate part is that this agitation is continuing for last 24 years, but this agitation has caused a big shock for Congress party, which was earlier enjoying power by scoring a majority of votes and since the agitation, Congress is able to stick to power with the support of some other political parties. Now, this agitation will be carried to its logical conclusion. For this, Hindus all over the country will be united. Such a resolution was adopted unanimously by hundreds of Dharmacharyas, Saints and Sages in Dharma Sansad (Religious Parliament) organised by Vishva Hindu Parishad on 7th February in Kumbh city.

Parliament, which will salute the saffron flag will be established ! – Swami Chinmayanand Maharaj

Swami Chinmayanand Maharaj of ‘Paramarth Niketan’ said, “In this country no proofs are sought for ‘Bal’ (Hair) of Hajarat; however, proofs are to be submitted in the court of law for Shriram birth place. Congress appeases Muslims by trampling religious faiths of Hindus. It nourishes Islamic terrorism. Even after the ruling of Judicial court that the location of Shriram birth place is beyond any doubts, obstacles are created. If Congress fails to enact a law for Ram temple in parliament before its session in the rainy season, Congress will be dismissed from power and a parliament, which will salute the
saffron flag will be established.”

Establish a spiritual base for Ram temple ! – Jagatguru Swami Ramabhadracharya Maharaj

Shri Ramanandanucharya Jagatguru Swami Ramabhadracharya Maharaj Said, “It is an exercise in day-dreaming that Congress will enact a law for Ram temple in the parliament. Therefore, be prepared for mid-term Parliamentary elections. Be active so that 370 M.P.s, who support Ram temple are sent to parliament. Now, to guide this movement, Shankaracharyas of all 4 Pithas should unite by ignoring their differences. In order to ward off dangers faced by Hindu Dharma and culture, it is necessary to perform religious rituals and create a spiritual base. Every Hindu should chant ‘Shriram Jay Ram Jay Jay Ram’ for 13 ‘Malas’ every day from 11th April.”

On this occasion, the President of Vishva Hindu Parishad Mr. Ashok Singhal, Yogi Adityanath M.P., Swami Dr. Ramakamal Das and other dignitaries guided the convention. Shankaracharya Swami Jayendra Saraswati, Shankaracharya Swami Naredranandaji, Shankaracharya Swami Vasudevanandaji and hundreds of Saints were present in Dharma Sansad.

BJP should take steps to stop offering of Namaz in Bhojshala ! - Jagatguru Swami Narendracharya Saraswati

BJP wrested power in M.P. on the point of Hindutva. If this government is granting permission to Muslims for offering of Namaz in Bhojshala by showing disrespect to Hindus, it should realise that we, Saints are ready to protect Hindutva. If the time calls for, we are even ready to sacrifice our lives to resist the offering of Namaz in Bhojshala. Therefore, first BJP should take steps to stop offering of Namaz in Bhojshala. This warning was issued by Jagatguru Swami Narendracharya Saraswati.

Reference to Mr. Narendra Modi drew big clapping response !

Anant Vibhushit Jagatguru Shri Swami Kaushalendra Prapannacharya Falahari Maharaj said, “For Ram temple, we need neither NDA nor UPA; we only want Mr.Narendra Modi. Congress has issued tickets for election to Muslims; BJP has also done the same thing. However, Mr. Narendra Modi has not issued the ticket to any Muslim in Gujarat elections, still he achieved a majority. Therefore, Mr. Narendra Modi must become the Prime Minister. He should be kept secured.” On this occasion, all present in
the Sansad responded with loud clapping and shouts of “Jay Shriram’.

BJP should create confidence among Saints that the BJP government assuming power in the Centre will be pro-Hindus ! – H.H. Govind Devgiri Maharaj

Prayagaraj (Uttar Pradesh) : BJP should create confidence among Saints that the BJP government assuming power in the Centre and its Prime Minister Mr. Narendra Modi will be pro-Hindus. The BJP government in M.P. is allowing Muslims to offer Namaz in the Bhojshala on the day Vasant Panchami. If such a government assumes power in the Centre, it will be of no use to Hindus. Hence, a government, who will meet all the demands of Hindus should come to power in the Centre. This demand was raised by H.H. Govind Devgiri Maharaj in the Sant Convention.

Source : Daily Sanatan Prabhat

Afzal Guru hanged in Tihar; Curfew imposed in Kashmir

At 8 am on Saturday, Afzal Guru, the main accused in the 
Parliament attack case of December 13, 2001 was hanged in Delhi's Tihar jail. The hanging comes less than three months after that of Mohammed Ajmal Kasab, the Pakistan-based terrorist who was part of the 26/11 Mumbai attack, earlier last November.
However, Guru's body will not to be handed to his relatives and he will be buried in Tihar Jail itself, in accordance with the rituals, said Union home secretary RK Singh in the national capital.
It was less than a week ago, on February 3, that President Pranab Mukherjee cleared Guru's file, thus setting the ball rolling for Guru's execution. Pronounced guilty and convicted to death by the Supreme Court in 2003, Guru's hanging had been kept pending for several years. In fact, the recent times have seen the principle Opposition party, the BJP, racheting up the political pressure on the UPA government to hang Guru.
The decision to hang Guru came soon after the President cleared the file. The Cabinet Committee on Security, chaired by the Prime Minister took the decision last week to go ahead with the hanging. By Friday, the centre had alerted the Jammu and Kashmir government as part of precautionary measures. The state government immediately imposed curfew in large parts of the state to ensure there were no law and order issues.
Guru's arrest came soon after the attack and he was charged under the controversial Prevention of Terrorism Act (POTA) that was passed by the AB Vajpayee-led NDA government and was later done away with by the Congree-led UPA. He was also charged with waging war against the state among other charges related to terrorism.
Union home secretary RK Singh told the media in a brief statement that by hanging Guru they had followed the rule of law. "The President cleared the file on February 3 and the decision was taken to go ahead soon after."
Political watchers say that this could be a move ny the UPA government to shore up its falling image as a preparation for a possible general elections in 2013. Guru's hanging was also controversial because the evidence that was used was questioned by several quarters. Some even alleged that in the absence of the real conspirators, the investigating agencies had been forced to make a scapegoat out of Guru. However the courts rejected these allegations and pronounced him guilty.
Meanwhile, curfew was imposed in the Kashmir valley, to prevent trouble in Guru's native Baramulla. Belonging to the Baramulla district in Jammu and Kashmir, Guru, who had completed the first year MBBS was preparing for IAS exams when he was arrested for being providing logistic support to the 'fidayeens' in New Delhi for carrying out terror attacks on government symbols like Parliament and embassies.
However, Unhappy with the situation there, he moved back to Kashmir and surrendered before the Border Security Force.
The Supreme Court of India in 2003 awarded te death sentence to Guru, which was to to be carried out on October 20, 2006. However, the execution was stayed even as Afzal remained on death row.
source:HJS

Muslim Appeasement Forces Bengal to Financial Doomsday Fast

Rhetoric of Mamata Didi in accusing the central government of snubbing Bengal intentionally leading to an empty treasury or on how a cash-strapped government can cater people’s basic needs has become intolerable to a multitude of Bengal’s population, according to sources. They have been found to wonder the government’s intentions even!

What is more, they have started to indict that the Chief Minister is just buying time only before the final collapse while her sycophants are busy in garnering wealth in every capacity – greatest example being the abysmal decline in law and order situation of the state. There are other charges as well – while lots feel that Didi is completely inept to administer, a greater number of people consider her as mere deceiver – even if the state government remains cash-strapped and the premier wonders where from she can manage 7% more to the existing Dearness Allowance to its employees (announced already), there has been no dearth of bountiful expenses to better Muslims – their Imams and Muazzins in particular.

Being a journalist, it has always been my prime concern to delve into any subject painstakingly. So when people are charging the Bengal premier of leading the state to a (apparent) religious bifurcation with financial destruciton, the issue must also be examined.

A glance at the available records reveals that the honorariums rendered to Imams and Muazzins have cost the state dearly.

According to statistics available from the Board of WAKFS Bengal, during the period from April 14, 2012 and December 30, 2012, Rs. 50 crore 51 lakh 44 thousand have been rendered to 23, 636 Imams of 19 districts. 10, 340 Muazzins of all these (19) districts have received Rs. 11 crore 36 lakh 36 thousand 160.  

The expenses regarding honorariums to Imams and Muazzins, as found from government records, are not minimal in any way but people consider that there is no necessity of the same. Since, mosque in any nook remains duty-bound to look after welfare of its employees through its own funds collected through Zakat there is no need of any other state-funded honorarium. 

How can this act of Didi be defined then? The majority of people in Bengal (including her own party’s members) considers said approaches as nothing except a blatant appeasement to Muslims ruining the state (when it is so stone-broke) altogether. They are also found to assert had the same money been used for developmental jobs, Bengal would have been better than what it is today.

But………..Muslim appeasement is call of the day and if the state fails miserably for doing the same, none is there to care.

Hail nationalism!  

Imam Bukhari beat up Muslim journalist for telling truth of Babar's invasion

The mass media, who always make a noise about their freedom, are keeping quiet on the issue of Bukhari beating up a reporter who tried to tell the truth as accepted by the Court. If such incident had taken place with any chief of a pro-Hindu organization or a Saint, all mass media, channels would have branded him as ‘Talibani’ and would have held discussion sessions on their channels; but here, the person involved is Muslim Imam, a Muslim Dharmaguru, therefore, all media is keeping quiet and all Hindus must realize this. How can such biased media ever carry out its duty impartially? - Editor SP

Imam didn’t tolerate the truth of Babur invading ‘Ramjanma-bhoomi’ presented by the Muslim reporter

Lucknow (Uttar Pradesh): Shahi Imam Maulana Ahmad Bukhari of Jama Mosque, Delhi severely beat up a Muslim reporter for his writing the truth about Babur’s invasion on the birth place of Sriram. This reporter had asked Bukhari for his views on Babur’s invasion of the birth-place of Sriram. A press conference was held by the Imam here for presenting views on the Allahabad’s High Court’s decision on ‘Ramjanma-bhoomi’ case.

A reporter of one Urdu periodical, Mohammad Abdul Wahid Chishti raised a query on the right of ownership on ‘Ramjanma-bhoomi’. Chishti tried to draw the attention of Bukhari on the point that the controversial land belonged to King Dasharath from the year 1528 and later, Babur built a mosque. Initially, Bukhari ignored the query; but Chishti again asked the same question leading to Bukhari losing his cool. He pounced on Chishti. Bukhari shouted that ‘Throw this person out; he is the agent of Congress. Keep your mouth shut. It is because of the traitors like you that Muslims were insulted.’ Thereafter Bukhari and his supporters severely beat up Chishti.

Bukhari wants to start riots in the country ! – Chishti

After this incident, Chishti said, “Bukhari has been trying to disturb the religious harmony by making explosive statements after thehistoric decision of Allahabad High Court on the ‘Ramjanma-bhoomi’. Till the verdict was not declared, Bukhari was saying that he would accept the verdict of the High Court; but since the verdict is out, he has changed his tune and has started making explosive statements against the verdict. He does not want peace. He wants riots to start in this country. To maintain the unity and harmony in this country, ‘Ramjanma-bhoomi’ belonging to Raja Dasharath, should be handed back to Hindus.”

Source: Daily Sanatan Prabhat

Also See

	Hindu Genocide in Kashmir & Bangladesh Online photo exhibition of Hindu genocide and temples destruction in Kashmir by local Muslims. Series of exhibitions being arranged. Read more
	Grave sins of Congress are driving India to doom! Highest sins of the Congress which is taking the country to Hell and of all political parties who are doing nothing about it but just letting that happen ! Read more

Wilders: Islamization of Europe Can Happen in America

WASHINGTON -- Dutch politician Geert Wilders has been labeled "Islam's public enemy number one." Consequently, he lives every day under a death sentence from Islamic jihadist groups like al Qaeda.

Wilders never walks the streets without a security detail and he and his wife must live in safe houses across the Netherlands. It's the price he pays for speaking out against the Islamization of Europe.

"I don't want to live - and my children to live - in a country based on Sharia law," Wilders told CBN News. "It's the worst thing that could happen. Democracy would end the day after Sharia was implemented."

In his new book, Marked for Death: Islam's War against the West and Me, Wilders lays out his argument against Islam and multiculturalism.

"If you walk through the streets of Amsterdam or Rotterdam or any other city in the Netherlands, you see that it has changed completely," he said. "People often don't feel at home anymore, don't feel safe anymore."

"There should not be Islamic schools," he opined. "There should not be more mosques in our free society because they represent an ideology of hate to be compared with fascism and communism."

Wilders' message resonates with many Dutch who are fed up with massive Muslim immigration. His Freedom Party is now the third largest in Holland.

His popularity only increased after he was found not guilty on hate speech charges in a Dutch court last year.

Wilders explained that what keeps him going in the face of such adversity is the need save his country from the cancer of "cultural relativism."

"I believe that the biggest disease in Europe today is called cultural relativism," Wilders told CBN News. "And I want to fight with all my life this misconception by politically correct, often liberal and leftist politicians, who invented the multicultural society, that all cultures are equal."

Wilders calls them "the facilitators" -- leftists who defend Islam while bashing Judeo-Christian civilization.

"I am proud to say that our culture - that is based on Christianity, on Judaism, on humanism -- is not only better, far better, than what I see as a barbaric Islamic culture, and that we should fight to preserve it for our children," he said.

Wilders wants to put an end to Muslim immigration to the Netherlands but says Muslims who assimilate into Dutch society are welcome.

"I even acknowledge the fact that the majority of Muslims in our free society are not terrorists, are law-abiding people," he said.

"I don't believe that there will be any moderate Islam--there is only one Islam, let me tell you, and that is the Islam of the Koran, of the hadith and of the Sira of Mohammed," he continued. "That's the only Islam."

"There are, however, people who don't live according to the life of Mohammed, who don't live according to the Sharia or the Koran," he acknowledged. "They are moderate and I applaud that."

Wilders maintains, however, that Islam and its teachings are the problem - not only for Europe but for America as well.

"My message to the American people with my book, Marked for Death, is please, don't make the mistakes we've made. What is happening in Europe can definitely happen in America tomorrow," he warned.

The dominoes are falling: EU ends ‘boycott’ of Modi

Barely two months before the Gujarat Assembly elections of December, British High Commissioner James Bevan traveled to Gandhinagar to meet Chief Minister Narendra Modi. The significance of that move was that it signalled the British government’s “re-engagement” with Gujarat under Modi and ended a 10-year freeze and a virtual ‘boycott’ over the 2002 riots.

It was also the first sign that Western powers in economic decline were beginning to climb down from the pedestal of the high moral ground that they had clambered onto, largely in response to the high-decibel campaign by domestic human rights constituencies to target Modi over the 2002 riots.  It also showed up the cracks in the united front that countries in the European Union had adopted on human rights considerations.

Now, those cracks have widened even further, and the entire wall of the European ‘diplomatic boycot’ of Modi looks set to come crashing down.

According to a report in the Indian Express, in early January, the ambassadors to India of all the countries of the European Union gathered at  German Ambassador Michael Steiner’s residence to host a lunch with Modi, who had been elected barely a fortnight earlier as Chief Minister for the fourth time.

Over lunch, according to the report, and at the two-hour interaction that they had, the ambassadors evidently asked Modi some “”tough” questions about the 2002 riots, presumably about allegations that the State government was either complicit in or passive in in its response to the riots.

Narendra Modi during his Delhi visit. PTI

Modi, the report adds, answered them “patiently”. In addition, it notes, he briefed the EU ambassadors about his model of governance, and his ideas for India.

The significance of this lunch, which has remained under wraps evidently because neither side wished to acknowledge it publicly, was that this was the first contact between envoys of the European Union countries and Modi since the riots of 2002. As the Indian Express acknowledges, it “signalled the end of the EU’s diplomatic boycott of him.”

Sources close to the European Union envoys are attempting to save face for themselves by noting that it was not they who had travelled to Gandhinagar to Modi – in the way that the British ambassador did in October – but Modi, who had traveled to Delhi to meet them at their invitation.

But the bottomline of the engagement, as one diplomatic source noted, is that it had become impossible to “ignore” Modi now, particularly after he had been re-elected for a third time and had established his political legitimacy – and had made it abundantly clear that he nursed ambitions of wanting to play a national role.

Late in August, Modi had hosted a Google+ hangout, at which he was asked by his ardent supporters when it would be possible for Modi to travel to the US (which has thus far steadfastly held onto the position that Modi would be unwelcome in the US). In response, Modi had said that while his supporters were dreaming that he should visit the US, he himself had another dream – that “we become so empowered that Americans queue up for visas one day.”

There’s still some way to go before that happens. But just the fact that the economically enfeebled European Union countries are rapidly climbing off the moral high horse that they had mounted following the 2002 riots is a sign of the times.

All this is not to say that the wheels of justice in India, which are in motion to fix the blame for the 2002 riots, will cease to spin. On Thursday, a three-judge bench of the Supreme Court gave Zakia Jafri, widow of former Congress MP Ehsaan Jafri, permission to file a fresh petition to challenge the Special Invetigation Team’s recommendation for the closure of criminal proceedings against Modi. The court’s decision, which sets aside a lower court ruling, is perceived as a setback to Modi, since it comes at just the time when the chorus for his appointment as the BJP’s candidate for prime ministership in 2014 is growing louder.

The judicial process will go on parallelly, but the European Union envoys’ formal end of the boycott of Modi after 11 years signals that in the court of international opinion at least, governments around the world are waking up to the realisation that there is little merit in continuing to ignore Modi – and much to be gained from working with him.

Protest : Havells hurts Hindu Sentiments by mocking ‘Griha Pravesh’ puja

Note : Anyone can send their lawful protest to concerned authorities directly through Comments Section on HJS Website.

Hindu Janajagruti Samiti (HJS) and 'Akhil Bharat Hindu Yuvak Sabha' have strongly protested advertisement made by international company 'Havells' for hurting Hindu sentiments. Refer letters below to understand how advertisement does improper presentation of sacred ritual of Hindus. You are requested to protest by sending comments (Your comments will be delivered to concerned authories.) and report the youtube video as hurting.

---

HINDU JANAJAGRUTI SAMITI 

‘Sree’

Bhadrapad Shudh Trayodashi

Kaliyug Varsha 5114

To,

Havells Group

Corporate Office

Noida - 201304 UP ( India)

Subject: Request to immediately withdraw the advertisement ‘Griha Pravesh’ of Havells wire
hurting religious sentiments of Hindus and render an unconditional apology.

Dear Sir,

We write to you on behalf of Hindu Janajagruti Samiti. The Hindu Janajagruti Samiti is a Non governmental organisation working for religious awakening of Hindus and bringing Hindus and other Organisations on common platform for the welfare of the Nation and the Hindu Dharma. Our details can be obtained at www.hindujagruti.org.
We came across your advertisement ‘Griha Pravesh’ ( 0.41 sec) on the you tube at http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O1XJZsOJFqE and the television advertisements reported to us by devout Hindus. This advertisement shows a couple performing a Vastu Shanti ritual (Homa) and the wife drops the steel spoon offering the oblations (ghee) in the homa (fire) due to heat. The couple’s son who is sitting nearby watching this gets up and tries to think of any idea to avoid the heat and he sees a box of Havells wire and gets any idea and makes a spoon like structure from Havells wire to offer the oblations in the fire and gives it to his mother who is shown using it comfortably. There is then this dialogue “Havells wire no fire”. This has made fun and mockery of one of the most important Hindu ritual ‘Vastu Shanti’
This advertisement has hurt religious sentiments of Hindus for the following reasons.

1. Use of Hindu ritual for commercial purpose rather than religious purpose. This is an offence as per Indian Trade Mark Act 1999.
2. The spoon for offering oblation (pali / sruva) is made of a particular material (wood) and has a definitive shape which cannot be replaced by any other form and material like wire.
3. This advertisement has distorted the Hindu ritual and given wrong information about Hindu dharma globally and to the younger generation which reduces the effectiveness of the ritual and is sinful.

It is quite surprising to see that an International Company like Havells which has a big market in India playing with the religious sentiments of Hindus. Continuation of such an act will definitely result in adding insult to injury of Hindus which in turn will boycott your products and thus affect your sales globally. Would you dare to use Muslim or Christian religion for commercial purpose?
We request you to immediately withdraw the advertisement ‘Griha Pravesh’ of Havells wire hurting religious sentiments of Hindus immediately and render an unconditional apology.

We await your prompt response and action.

Yours Sincerely.

Dr.Manoj V. Solanki.

Convenor

Hindu Janajagruti Samiti  (Goa)

India

Cc to:

Registered Office :
1, Raj Narain Marg, Civil Lines, Delhi - 110 054

---

Akhil Bharat Hindu Yuvak Sabha

Letter No. ABHYS/2013/005

Date : 10th January 2013

To,

Havells Group

Corporate Office

Noida - 201304 UP ( India)

Subject:-Removal of the objectionable advertisement from TV advertising as well as Internet media

Shriman Jee,

This is to bring to your notice that we have received many phone calls about the objectionable Havells wire advertisement

that your marketing team is broadcasting both on internet and TV.we also have watched the said advertisement and found it

highly objectionable.

The ad is depicting a Hindu family performing Griha Prawesh Pooja (House warming Ceremony),and during the same Yajna lady of the house has been deliberately shown using a cutlery spoon for aahuti to the Yajna in place of Sruvaa which is hurting her , followed by her son bringing the Havells wire for offering aahuti to Yajna (fire).

Importantly Sruvva is prescribed by our vedic texts to be used during offerings and you are trying to change the very concept mentioned in our scriptures.

Though we appreciate feeling of small son towards his mother, we out rightly reject the depiction of using wire for offerings in the yajna, this is an insult to our vedic culture and Hindu way of worship. We are highly offended by this representation in commercials.
For the commercial interest your organization cannot hurt Hindus who hold the Yajnas pious and utmost religious , by using Yajna and then portrayal of same in bad light is not acceptable to Hindus of the country. We request you to kindly take serious note of this and with immediate effect withdraw this advertisement for all the mediums of publicity.

I am herewith sharing the link for your further corrective action. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O1XJZsOJFqE

Thanking you and Jai Shri Ram

Rakesh Gurkha

National Spokesman

Akhil Bharat Hindu Yuvak Sabha

Follow HJS on Social Media

Share on facebook

Share on twitter 

Share on google_follow 

Share on youtube

Related Articles

» Protest : Depiction of Rahul Gandhi as Shiva and Sonia Gandhi as Rani Lakshmibai in Kumbh Mela
» Success of HJS : ‘Shiva Analytical (India) Ltd.’ to stop distortion of India’s map
» Success of Hindu Unity : Bangalore art academy removes 'nude paintings of Deities'